![](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/559b2478e4b05d22b1e75b2d/1437699387748-ZXS6RAMR570J7D0CZI0M/legal-practioner-blog-header-impact-fund.jpg)
PRACTITIONER BLOG
Read our analyses of developments in Impact Litigation and stay current on class action law
![Ninth Circuit Finds That Discrimination Is A Concrete Injury For Purposes Of Article III Standing](https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/559b2478e4b05d22b1e75b2d/1644890887865-ZFHI5PURYB2NFVK9X399/Citizenship.jpg)
Ninth Circuit Finds That Discrimination Is A Concrete Injury For Purposes Of Article III Standing
The last few years have brought more and more standing-based challenges to our clients’ ability to have their day in court, with some success – look no further than TransUnion v. Ramirez, for example. Fortunately, the Ninth Circuit just rejected an attempt to insulate a bank from liability for admitted citizenship discrimination on standing grounds. Chattopadhyay v. BBVA is a class action alleging that BBVA (Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria) discriminates on the basis of citizenship status in violation of 42 U.S.C. 1981 and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act.